tell me the truth, the ecological footprint veritaaaaaa 
What is happening to information of the mass, in this period, it is quite visible to everyone. While the government is not ashamed to take on characteristics of the parliament and play hide and seek with
schedule, the other behaves more cautiously, to attack the media on paper. Where "more cautiously," I mean who does shady things
.
Today in particular I am referring to the bill on wiretapping, which makes a lame chain already in the arms of the Italian journalists. Basically there is the fear of criminal and civil complaints, the son of the fact that very often alleged to have defamed a body of lawyers
quite substantial, and on the other hand, the journalist is
abandoned, and is therefore easy also in a position of doubt, it should be condemned and dismissed as abusive.
To avoid the collapse of a company to print small to medium, the editor often puts his hands forward and puts pressure on the journalist, who at this point has to be careful what he writes. In addition to report an act of the proceedings (and later process) criminal, and not encountering any complaints, we must demonstrate good writer (not to himself, the court always h) that the news is true-
-both in the public interest
-tone does not have an unnecessarily aggressive
-there are no unnecessary personal news
... So far so good, but the absurdity is that if our hero is too precise, and shows the way, I do icont with Article 114 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if it says to the news summary, the risk of having to deal with the civil court for defamation, since it was not quite accurate.
The new privacy law, then broaden the spectrum of article 114 and 329, purporting to impose a penalty of 5000 pleural those who violate the secret place of acts of investigation and of any publication arbitraira "(These last two words give the court a complete discretion), in addition to the editor of the newspaper is given the sword of Damocles that weighs about the administrative liability for crimes committed by depending, of business ... So what? and for each note of the proceedings TRUE, no longer as secret investigation, contained in a proper and detailed the publisher is likely to pay a minimum of 25 000 to a maximum of 465 pennies ... At this point the publisher will put pressure on the reporter, because he thong away from situations too shady.
The solution? easy oggiogiorno lawsuit who risks nothing, and for the first speech of his large defensive capability, and because, from a legal standpoint, the best he can come across is the payment of the costs of the process. Discourage wild complaint, it would seem a riemdio effective enough to limit the excessive power of the plaintiff or indirectly crush the freedom of those who want to bring to light aspects of the often cumbersome process Italians.
